Editorial Governance

IoMT.today publishes institutional-grade analysis of the Internet of Medical Things. This page describes how editorial decisions are made, how independence is preserved, and how readers can hold us accountable.

Independence

IoMT.today is reader-supported and accepts no advertising. We do not run sponsored posts, native advertising, or pay-to-play coverage. Editorial decisions are made by the editorial team without input from any commercial partner, vendor, or subject of coverage.

Sourcing standards

Claims of fact must be supported by named primary sources, peer- reviewed literature, regulatory filings, or on-the-record interviews.
Anonymous sources are used only when the information is in the public interest and cannot be obtained on the record. The reasoning is recorded internally.
Forward-looking statements (forecasts, market sizing, projections) are clearly labelled as such and the methodology is disclosed.

Conflicts of interest

Contributors disclose financial holdings, employment, consulting relationships, and advisory positions relevant to the subject of any article. Where a conflict cannot be eliminated, it is disclosed in the article itself or the contributor is recused.

AI usage

Generative tools may be used internally for research, summarisation, or copy editing. They are not used to fabricate quotes, sources, or data. Any AI-generated illustrative imagery is labelled.

Corrections

We correct factual errors promptly and transparently. Corrections are noted at the foot of the affected article with the date and nature of the change. Substantive corrections are also issued in the next newsletter. To report an error, use the Contact form and select “Correction”.

Reader feedback